We also analyzed the influence of the participants knowledge on the use of each approach and the amount of material consultation required for each variability management approach. We empirically compared them by conducting an experiment with more than 50 participants in terms of configuring SPL products and variability traceability among class and component diagram variable elements. In this paper, we analyze a subset of such approaches: SMarty (our approach), PLUS, and Razavian and Khosravi. There are few experiments in the literature to evaluate and to compare UML-based variability management approaches. Thus, managing variability is a crucial activity for the success of SPL engineering, especially those based on UML due to a large amount of variability representation in different diagrams. The varying features and respective elements (variability) enable differentiating products of a certain domain.
Smarty plus software#
The results did not point to the advantages of the SMarty approach over PLUS, but point out discussion points and improvements for SMarty and the experimentation process followed.Ī Software Product Line (SPL) represents a set of systems sharing common and variable features.
Smarty plus plus#
Thus, in this paper, we continue the process of continuous experimentation and evolution of SMarty comparing it with the PLUS method with regard to the ability to configure SPL specifics products from use case diagrams. Thus, experimental studies have been developed in recent years to demonstrate the effectiveness of SMarty in relation to other similar approaches. With the creation of the SMarty approach, a continuous experimental evaluation process was started in relation to other approaches with the same purpose. Literature has no reports of experimental evaluations comparing existing approaches. To manage variabilities, there are several approaches widely known in literature, such as, PLUS and SMarty. One of the main SPL development activities is variability management. The adoption of SPL provides several benefits, such as, the decreasing in time for building a system and reducing its cost. they’re also making it impossible to get my money back in compensation for my time as stated within their own terms and conditions!! avoid the hassle and don’t bother with this phone service.Software Product Line (SPL) represents a set of systems that share common and variable elements, to meet the specific needs of a particular market segment, providing the necessary flexibility for product customization and diversification.
they also have no telephone helpline so no way to contact them without the data that they provide if you are abroad. insinuated that it was my fault for not replying quickly when I couldn't access the help chat because THEY disconnected me from the data. when informed about this, Furkhan said “sorry if you feel that way” - a completely inappropriate response instead of fixing my issue. suspended my service with no warning and therefore violated the terms of their fair use policy in their contract by disconnecting me within less than 30days abroad out of 60 within the fair use policy. left me with no service at all for AT LEAST 4 days while abroad. slow with communication and customer-blaming for issues on their end.
Awful service with complete lack of transparency.
0 kommentar(er)
